Just like I myself had to fall from selling drugs I made the decision to better myself and rise up and be the person I wanted to …show more content… The sound of this filmed is used to bring you down to the level of Remy so you can see the world through his eyes. This single mistake formed a bond between Linguine and Remy that is the infrastructure of the entire film. Remy has to jump in and single handily save Linguine 's career and the restaurant, Remy had never cooked at a level like that but took the risk to the save they and rise to the occasion. As soon as Linguine started working at Guesteus he made the biggest mistake up to the point of film for him of changing the recipe of soup on the burner. Guesteus falling from his thrown of a five star restaurant to Skinner the villain of this story mismanaging the restaurant from the overreach of greed with his frozen food line.
#Ratatouille movie questions movie
Remy understands that in his life nothing is given to him and he is going to have …show more content… Throughout the story of this movie they are many rise and falls. Remy has a dream similar to mine in his desire to be successful. Anyone can do anything with hard work invested. I wish and aim to be more like Remy, although some might say my dreams will be hard to achieve or nearly impossible to reach I will think that anyone can cook. You can do anything you set your mind to. “anyone can cook” a line much important to Ratatouilles overall meaning. Remy has a passion for cooking and reads cookbooks and watched Gusteau. Although Remy is trapped in his rat like state he is still the best cook at Gusteaus. In addition to Gusteau's will that was dated to 2004, there's another evidence that shows Ratatouille is set in the present and that's the health inspection officer's form on the wall that is certified in the year 1998 and it's expiration date is in the year 2020.The story of Ratatouille is one of Pixars greatest creations, Remy a master chef stuck in the body of a rat. So Bomb Voyage is in Ratatouille but he should've been more than 80 years old if we assume he was 30 in The Incredibles!Īnother mistake is seen when Skinner and Linguini drink a beverage from 1961. Incredible is reading and that's approximately where the act II of the movie starts.Īct II starts 15 years after the act I. May 16th, 1962 is the date written on the newspaper that Mr. He, with that appearance was in the act I of The Incredibles which was set in 1947. This is Bomb Voyage from The Incredibles (the left-side picture is him in the Ratatouille and the right-side one is him in The Incredibles). I don't know this huge mistake was intentional or not. I think it was a very huge mistake by the movie staff to implement old things in a work that is set in the present. But I do not see any deeper meaning in a film like Ratatouille beyond these points and I don't think detailed comparisons to when and where gadgets appeared and disappeared in our world are helpful here. Showing objects prominently could also be seen as an hommage to something. Omitting certain technologies, that would have been there was it our world, can be seen as a form of criticism. The concrete reasons why they prefer certain objects over others can be as simple as aesthetics and emphasis on certain craftsmanship. Why not? On a whole, cinema has always been about escapism from the real world - showing us dream worlds - and they are still fulfilling this role today. The fictional movie world is just different in some points and very similar in other aspects. With this in mind, it's perfectly fine that there's an unusual combination of gadgets as compared to our world. Above all, my main point is that the movie is fictional and just as the portrayal of animals deviates from reality other aspects may deviate too. Even though you can argue that the animals in the movie actually communicate with their own set of sounds and it's only projected to English for the audience's sake, this doesn't change the fact that in the movie the animals are smarter than in reality and display human qualities. They certainly cannot reflect on their traits of character and most, if not all, animals don't even have an understanding of self-awareness equivalent to humans. They can only express in a very limited way what they like, how the feel, etc. Real animals make noise, they don't communicate at the same level of complexity. Update: Since there are so many comments about that, let me clarify that "talking" is a human action - I intentionally used this word in the above paragraph. This movie world may resemble our own world, but it's clearly not identical, since we don't have talking animals in reality. Let us not forget that we talk about a fictional movie that features animals talking with human voices.
0 kommentar(er)
